马卡发布的投票显示，86%皇马球迷支持卖掉维尼修斯（马卡投票结果：86%皇马球迷赞成出售维尼修斯）

Evaluating news verification process

I want to consider how to approach this news request. A clarifying question might help—should I verify this for you? It seems best to ask if you’d like me to fact-check and find the original poll link, including details like date, sample size, and wording. I need to keep in mind that Twitter/X polls aren't scientific, and Spanish outlets can sometimes feature controversial polls. I can propose steps to gather more context about the specific incident.Considering response options

I’m thinking about how to approach this request. There’s some recent context with criticism surrounding diving and fights, but I shouldn't jump to conclusions. I want to provide options concisely and ask if verification is needed. Responding in Chinese could be more fitting. I might say I can't confirm the data's authenticity and ask if you need me to verify the source.

Offering steps for verification seems smart, like checking the original poll link, date, sample size, and context. I'll also remind about potential bias in media polls.

这是个未经核实的说法。要不要我帮你查证马卡原始投票的链接、发布时间、投票方式/样本量，以及是否被其它权威媒体引用？也会说明这个投票是否只是网站/社媒民调（不具统计代表性，易被刷票）。

如果有看到的链接或大致时间（比如哪天的报道/推文），发我更快核实。